Third World Network  
About Us Contact Subscribe Sitemap Home
 
      
    » Advanced Search   
Biosafety Science
Agriculture / Organisms
Traits in Agriculture
» Herbicide Tolerance
» Pest Resistance
» Disease Resistance
» Enhanced Nutrition
» Drought Tolerance
Biomedical Applications
Assessment & Impacts
Trends in Industry
Global Agreements and Fora
Policy and Regulation
Key Regulatory Issues
Sustainable Systems
Biosafety Assessment Tool (BAT)
Biosafety
Information
Service
Meetings
Campaigns
Publications
 
Traits in Agriculture » Pest Resistance

Title: Pesticides in Bt Cotton Cultivation Still A Health Hazard to Farm Workers
Publication date: February 17, 2017
Posting date: February 17, 2017

THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE

 

Dear Friends and Colleagues

Pesticides in Bt Cotton Cultivation Still A Health Hazard to Farm Workers

An article published in the journal Nature analyses two recent studies on the potential of genetically modified Bt cotton to reduce pesticide usage in the country. The first study wasby Veettil et al. (2016) which found that the use of Btcotton had slowed pesticide exposure by limiting the overall need for pesticide sprays when compared with non-Bt cotton. Theybuilt a model to quantify Bt cotton’s environmental impact during the 2002–2008 period when Bt cotton was adopted in India.

However, Venkata et al. (2016) argue that Bt cotton is still sprayed with pesticides, presenting risks for farmers and wage labourers who weed and pluck the cotton. They found that workers reported significantly greater qualitative health problems, ranging from fatigue to hair loss, and experienced significantly greater DNA and chromosomal damage, as assessed by a micronucleus frequency test of blood and buccal cheek samples, compared to a control group of non-agricultural workers. This study combined molecular and qualitative health analyses and focused on the risks encountered by a sample composed of young female cotton workers, the population who provide the primary manual labour in Indian cotton fields.          

The differing conclusions of the studies can be partly explained by their methodologies. Veettil et al. drew on a large, national sample of 341–380 farmers in 58 villages. Their respondents represented relatively few people in any given village, and their panels did not assess the risks of pesticide use among the farm labourers, the group at highest risk of exposure. Furthermore, they reported that 99% of their respondents were planting Bt cotton by the final year of the survey, so their non-Bt control groups were not representative of normal cotton management practices. As Indian farmers have overwhelmingly adopted Bt cotton, the most accurate assessment of the toxicological risk to the farm ecosystem would come not from a comparison of Bt and virtually non-existent non-Bt farmers, but from an analysis of workers exposed to pesticides in Bt cotton fields, which was what Venkata et al. did by surveying active cotton workers.

They were thus able to capture field conditions that influenced risk factors, including the negligible use of protective garments, exposure to mixtures of pesticides, and the long duration of Indian cotton farming. Therefore, despite reductions in highly toxic pesticide use since 2002, Bt cotton agriculture remains a risky profession for farm workers in India.

The article is available at http://www.nature.com/articles/nplants2016212

With best wishes,

Third World Network
131 Jalan Macalister
10400 Penang
Malaysia
Email: twn@twnetwork.org
Websites: http://www.twn.my/ and http://www.biosafety-info.net/
To subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net


 Printer friendly version
 

 
| Home | About Us | Subscribe | Contact | Sitemap |
Disclaimer | Privacy
Copyright © 2004 - 2017 Biosafety Information Centre    All Rights Reserved