THIRD WORLD NETWORK INFORMATION SERVICE ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
Dear Friends and Colleagues
Organic Soils Store More Carbon Than Conventional Soils
Conventional agriculture is one of the main causes of the depletion of carbon in the soil and the increased presence of carbon in our atmosphere. Decline in soil organic matter (SOM) is of particular concern due to its key role in maintaining soil health. On the other hand, soils high in organic matter support healthy crops, are less susceptible to drought, and foster a diversity of organisms vital to soil health. Soils rich in organic matter can also maintain carbon for long periods of time, and help reduce the causes of climate change.
A study directed by The National Soil Project at Northeastern University in collaboration with the Organic Center, USA, compared 659 organic soil samples from 39 states and 728 conventional soil samples from all 48 contiguous states across the United States. One of the largest field studies of its kind ever conducted, it used cutting-edge methods to look at how organic farming affects the soil’s ability to lock away carbon and keep it out of our atmosphere.
The study found that all components of humic substances, namely, fulvic acid and humic acid, were consistently higher in organic than in conventional soils. On average, soils from organic farms had: 13% higher soil organic matter; 150% more fulvic acid; 44% more humic acid; and 26% greater potential for long-term carbon storage. Humic substances – made up of carbon and other elements – are the life-blood of fertile soils. These substances resist degradation and can remain in the soil for hundreds to thousands of years. The more humic substances in a soil, the longer that soil traps and keeps carbon out of the atmosphere.
The overall results show that organic farming practices support healthy soils and build and/or maintain SOM more effectively than conventional farming practices; significant evidence that organic agricultural practices can help to mitigate climate change. Studies have found that organic farming practices such as the use of manure and legume cover crops, extended crop rotations, fallowing and rotational grazing increase soil organic matter and soil health.
With best wishes,
Third World Network
131 Jalan Macalister
Websites: http://www.twn.my/and http://www.biosafety-info.net/
To subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net
BREAKTHROUGH STUDY SHOWS ORGANIC CUTS AGRICULTURE’S CONTRIBUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
The Organic Center
11 September 2017
A new groundbreaking study proves soils on organic farms store away appreciably larger amounts of carbons – and for longer periods — than typical agricultural soils. The important study, directed by The National Soil Project at Northeastern University in collaboration with the Organic Center, provides a new significant proof point that organic agricultural practices build healthy soils and can be part of the solution in the fight on global warming.
The new data will be published in the Oct. 1 issue of the scientific journal Advances in Agronomy. One of the largest field studies of its kind ever conducted, the study pulls together over a thousand soil samples from across the nation. It uses cutting-edge methods to look at how organic farming affects the soil’s ability to lock away carbon and keep it out of our atmosphere.
One of its most compelling findings is that on average, organic farms have 44% higher levels of humic acid — the component of soil that sequesters carbon over the long term — than soils not managed organically.
Agriculture is one of the main causes of the depletion of carbon in the soil and the increased presence of carbon in our atmosphere, as evidenced by a recent study published by the National Academy of Sciences that estimated agriculture’s role in global soil carbon loss. Organic farming can play a key role in restoring soil carbon and in reducing the causes of climate change, and this study proves that.
Working with Dr. Elham Ghabbour and Dr. Geoffrey Davies, leaders of the National Soil Project at Northeastern University, The Organic Center contacted organic farmers who acted as “citizen scientists” to collect organic soil samples from throughout the country to compare with the conventional soil samples already in the National Soil Project’s data set. Altogether, the study measured 659 organic soil samples from 39 states and 728 conventional soil samples from all 48 contiguous states. It found that ALL components of humic substances were higher in organic than in conventional soils.
“This study is truly groundbreaking,” said Dr. Jessica Shade, Director of Science Programs for The Organic Center. “We don’t just look at total soil organic carbon, but also the components of soil that have stable pools of carbon – humic substances, which gives us a much more accurate and precise view of the stable, long-term storage of carbon in the soils.”
“To our knowledge, this research is also the first to take a broad-view of organic and conventional systems, taking into account variation within management styles, across crops, and throughout the United States. It gives a large-scale view of the impact of organic as a whole, throughout the nation,” said Dr. Shade.
“We were focused on developing and adopting reliable methods of soil analyses for this national project. It was a huge, co-operative effort involving hundreds of sample donors. The results of this project will be of value to farmers, policy makers and the public at large,” said Dr. Davies.
Digging deeper into the matter
Healthy soils are essential for robust and resilient crop production, and the amount of soil organic matter is one of the most critical components of a healthy soil. Organic matter is all the living and dead plant and animal material in our dirt than make it more than dirt – earthworms and insects and microorganisms, plant and animal residues, fermented compost, decomposed leaves and plant roots. Soils high in organic matter support healthy crops, are less susceptible to drought, and foster a diversity of organisms vital to soil health. Soils rich in organic matter can also maintain carbon for long periods of time, and help reduce the causes of climate change.
“A number of studies have shown that practices commonly used in organic farming increase soil organic matter and soil health,” said Dr. Tracy Misiewicz, Associate Director of Science Programs for The Organic Center. “Some of these practices include the use of manure and legume cover crops, extended crop rotations, fallowing and rotational grazing. These same practices are likely also involved in increasing the important humic substances in soil.”
The gold standard of organic matter are the humic substances. Humic substances – made up of carbon and other elements – are the life-blood for fertile soils. These substances resist degradation and can remain in the soil for hundreds and sometimes thousands of years. They don’t just mean healthy soil; they are also one of the most effective ways to mitigate climate change. The more humic substances in a soil, the longer that healthy soil is trapping and keeping carbon out of the atmosphere.
This stable pool of carbon is therefore more representative of stable carbon sequestration in the soil. Specifically measuring humic substances in soil gives an accurate understanding of long-term soil health and carbon sequestration.
Farmer samples show organic stores more carbon
The study shows that the components of humic substances – fulvic acid and humic acid — were consistently higher in organic than in conventional soils.
The research found that, on average, soils from organic farms had:
- 13 percent higher soil organic matter
- 150 percent more fulvic acid
- 44 percent more humic acid
- 26 percent greater potential for long-term carbon storage
This is the first time scientific research has given an accurate picture of the long-term soil carbon storage on organic versus conventional farms throughout the U.S., since most studies focus on individual farms or total soil organic carbon. The Organic Center’s study takes farms from around the nation into account and looks at the most accurate measure of carbon sequestration.
A real-world study with real-world impacts
Since 2008, the National Soil Project at Northeastern has been measuring the organic soil content of soil throughout the nation. Its collected samples were primarily of conventional soil. Drs. Davies and Ghabbour, the directors of the National Soil Project, were seeing very low levels of humic substances in these conventional soil samples.
In 2014, The Organic Center helped the National Soil Project design and develop a study to compare the project’s conventional soil samples to organic soil samples. The Organic Center worked with the researchers as organic experts through the project, contacted organic farmers throughout the country for soil samples, and performed the statistical analyses of the data.
Farmers collected the samples in 2015 and 2016. Fifty-gram samples (2-3 tablespoons) of air-dried surface (0-30 cm) agricultural top soil, along with the geographical (GPS) location, texture and classification (if known) were provided.
“This study shows there are positive differences in organic soil,” said Minnesota organic farmer Carmen Fernholz, who sent in soil samples from his 425-acre organic corn, soybean and small grains farm. “We are showing that organic farming enhances the soil, so this is how we have to move forward. For me as a farmer, the most important results of this research is that USDA should now prioritize its organic management system and our organic research dollars.”
“The more we understand about the Soil Organic Matter system, the better we can monitor, measure and maintain it,” said organic produce grower Helen Atthowe who submitted samples from her and her husband’s 26-acre Woodleaf Farm in northern California. “The results of this study can make Soil Organic Matter more predictable to manage and thus easier for more farmers to adopt practices that encourage organic matter.”
“Our study compares soils from the real world, and its findings can have a huge impact on the real world,” said Dr. Shade of The Organic Center. “These results highlight the potential of organic agriculture to increase the amount of carbon sequestration in the soil, and by doing so help decrease a major cause of climate change.”
SEQUESTERED ORGANIC MATTER CONTENTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC FARM SOILS
Elham A.Ghabbour, E.A., Davies, G., Misiewicz, T. et al.
Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 146, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.07.003Get rights and content
Intensive agriculture has been linked to declining soil fertility and is a known source of greenhouse gas emissions. Decline in soil organic matter (SOM) is of particular concern due to its key role in maintaining soil health. Previous research supports the view that fertility management practices utilized in organic agriculture can maintain and even grow the SOM pool, but fewer studies examine what proportion of SOM is sequestered over long periods of time. Using data from the National Soil Project SOM sequestration between soils from organically and conventionally managed farms from across the United States is compared. Total %SOM ranged from 0.63 to 46.1 for conventional farm samples (mean 7.37) and 0.5 to 88.9 for the organic samples (mean 8.33). %FA ranged from 0.08 to 2.20 (mean 0.26) for conventional and 0.04 to 14.8 (mean 0.65) organic farm soils. %HA ranged from 0.17 to 23.0 (mean 2.85) for conventional and 0.25 to 48.9 (mean 4.1) for organic samples. Mean %humification (i.e., sequestration) was 45.6 for conventional soils and 57.3 for organic. Results presented here support previous assertions that FA are the precursors of HA. With the exception of water retention, comparisons of SOM, FA, HA, and humification suggest that organic farming practices support healthy soils and build and/or or maintain SOM more effectively than conventional farming practices. The data from this study can serve as benchmarks for other soils, and the spectroscopic analytical approaches employed should be useful in tracking the effects of changes in farm soil management practices over space and time.