THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE
Dear Friends and Colleagues
Largest-Ever Study of GE Crops and Pesticide Use Finds Negative Environmental Impact in the U.S.
Since 2008, genetically engineered (GE) crops have accounted for more than 80% of maize and soybean crops planted in the U.S. According to new research from University of Virginia in the U.S. (Item 1), widespread adoption of GE crops has decreased the use of insecticides, but increased the use of weed-killing herbicides as weeds become more resistant, leading to negative environmental impacts. This is the largest study of GE crops and pesticide use to date. Four economists studied annual data from more than 5,000 soybean and 5,000 maize farmers in the U.S. from 1998 to 2011, far exceeding previous studies that had been limited to one or two years of data (Item 2).
In the U.S., maize seeds are genetically engineered with insect-resistant (IR) and/or glyphosate-tolerant (GT) genes. Soybeans are largely engineered with just one GT gene. The study found that IR-maize farmers used about 11.2% less insecticide and GT-maize farmers used 1.2% less herbicide than non-GM farmers over the 13-year period. However, GT soybean adopters used 28% more herbicides than non-adopters. The study found that adopters of both GE GT maize and soybean increased their herbicide use during the last five years of the study, consistent with the emergence of glyphosate weed resistance. The reduction in glyphosate use during the same period was attributed to farmers having to use additional chemicals to deal with the glyphosate-resistant weeds.
The researchers also measured the overall environmental impact of the changes in chemical use that have resulted from the adoption of GE crops, using a measure called the environmental impact quotient, or EIQ, to account for chemical impact on farmworkers, consumers and the environment. They found that the adoption of GE soybeans correlated with anegative impact on the environment as increased herbicide use also increased contamination of local ecosystems.
With best wishes
Third World Network
131 Jalan Macalister
10400 Penang
Malaysia
Email: twn@twnetwork.org
Websites: https://biosafety-info.net/and http://www.twn.my/
To subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net
____________________________________________________________________________
Item 1
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CROPS AND PESTICIDE USE IN U.S. MAIZE AND SOYBEANS
by Edward D. Perry, Federico Ciliberto, David A. Hennessy and GianCarlo Moschini
Science Advances 31 August 2016
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600850
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/8/e1600850
Abstract
The widespread adoption of genetically engineered (GE) crops has clearly led to changes in pesticide use, but the nature and extent of these impacts remain open questions. We study this issue with a unique, large, and representative sample of plot-level choices made by U.S. maize and soybean farmers from 1998 to 2011. On average, adopters of GE glyphosate-tolerant (GT) soybeans used 28% (0.30 kg/ha) more herbicide than nonadopters, adopters of GT maize used 1.2% (0.03 kg/ha) less herbicide than nonadopters, and adopters of GE insect-resistant (IR) maize used 11.2% (0.013 kg/ha) less insecticide than nonadopters. When pesticides are weighted by the environmental impact quotient, however, we find that (relative to nonadopters) GE adopters used about the same amount of soybean herbicides, 9.8% less of maize herbicides, and 10.4% less of maize insecticides. In addition, the results indicate that the difference in pesticide use between GE and non-GE adopters has changed significantly over time. For both soybean and maize, GT adopters used increasingly more herbicides relative to nonadopters, whereas adopters of IR maize used increasingly less insecticides. The estimated pattern of change in herbicide use over time is consistent with the emergence of glyphosate weed resistance.
Item 2
LARGEST-EVER STUDY REVEALS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS
by Caroline Newman
University of Virginia
https://news.virginia.edu/content/largest-ever-study-reveals-environmental-impact-genetically-modified-crops
According to new research from University of Virginia economist Federico Ciliberto, widespread adoption of genetically modified crops has decreased the use of insecticides, but increased the use of weed-killing herbicides as weeds become more resistant.
Ciliberto led the largest study of genetically modified crops and pesticide use to date, alongside Edward D. Perry of Kansas State University, David A. Hennessy of Michigan State University and GianCarlo Moschini of Iowa State University. The four economists studied annual data from more than 5,000 soybean and 5,000 maize farmers in the U.S. from 1998 to 2011, far exceeding previous studies that have been limited to one or two years of data.
“The fact that we have 14 years of farm-level data from farmers all over the U.S. makes this study very special,” Ciliberto said. “We have repeated observations of the same farmers and can see when they adopted genetically modified seeds and how that changed their use of chemicals.”
Since 2008, genetically engineered crops have accounted for more than 80 percent of maize and soybean crops planted in the U.S. Maize seeds are modified with two genes: one kills insects that eat the seed and one allows the seed to tolerate glyphosate, a herbicide commonly used in weed killers like Roundup. Soybeans are modified with just one glyphosate-resistant gene.
Unsurprisingly, maize farmers who used the insect-resistant seeds used significantly less insecticide – about 11.2 percent less – than farmers who did not use genetically modified maize. The maize farmers also used 1.3 percent less herbicide over the 13-year period.
Soybean crops, on the other hand, saw a significant increase in herbicide use, with adopters of genetically modified crops using 28 percent more herbicides than non-adopters. Ciliberto attributes this increase to the proliferation of glyphosate-resistant weeds.
“In the beginning, there was a reduction in herbicide use, but over time the use of chemicals increased because farmers were having to add new chemicals as weeds developed a resistance to glyphosate,” Ciliberto said.
Maize farmers, he said, have not yet had to address the same level of resistance, in part because they did not adopt genetically modified crops as quickly as their counterparts in the soy industry. However, the study did find evidence that both maize and soybean farmers increased herbicide use during the last five years of the study, indicating that weed resistance is a growing problem for both groups.
From 2006 to 2011, the percentage of hectares sprayed with only glyphosate shrunk from more than 70 percent to 41 percent for soybean farmers and from more than 40 percent to 19 percent for maize farmers. The decrease resulted from farmers having to resort to other chemicals as glyphosate-resistant weeds became more common.
“Evidence suggests that weeds are becoming more resistant and farmers are having to use additional chemicals, and more of them,” Ciliberto said.
Insects do not appear to have developed a similar resistance, in part because federal regulations require farmers to have a “safe haven” in their fields that is free of genetically modified crops. Insects and worms in those safe havens have no need to develop resistance, and because they interact and breed with insects in other parts of the field, they help prevent the development of resistant genes.
Despite the decrease in insecticide use, continued growth in herbicide use poses a significant environmental problem as large doses of the chemicals can harm biodiversity and increase water and air pollution.
Ciliberto and his colleagues measured the overall environmental impact of the changes in chemical use that have resulted from the adoption of genetically modified crops, using a measure called the environmental impact quotient, or EIQ, to account for chemicals’ impact on farmworkers, consumers and the environment. Comparing adopters to non-adopters, they found little change in the impact on farmworkers and consumers. However, the adoption of genetically modified soybeans correlated with a negative impact on the environment as increased herbicide use also increased contamination of local ecosystems.
Overall, Ciliberto said he was surprised by the extent to which herbicide use had increased and concerned about the potential environmental impact.
“I did not expect to see such a strong pattern,” he said.