Only the core issues of the Biosafety Protocol were negotiated at Montreal in 2000. The remaining provisions were basically the same as those negotiated at the earlier talks in Cartagena in 1999. Lim Li Lin analyses and comments on these core provisions. […]
|
||||||
|
At Cartagena, the South African government surprised critics by displaying a maturity and understanding of the issues and concerns facing developing countries on the question of GMOs. […] Just when the stage appeared to be set for the emergence of the world’s first international law to regulate the use, handling and cross-border transfers of GMOs in Cartegena in 1999, the US-led attacks crippled the talks. […] Despite its declaration that it was ready to back the South to ensure an effective biosafety protocol, the European Union’s conduct at the Cartagena negotiations clearly revealed that it was quite prepared to abandon the South and the cause of biosafety. […] The negotiations at Cartagena in 1999 were doomed to failure, argues Lavanya Rajamani, given the backdrop in which they were conducted. The real battle was over trade, not biosafety. […] At Cartagena in 1999 during the negotiation on the Biosafety protocol, the South put forward the basic constituents of a strong Biosafety Protocol. Gurdial Singh Nijar, sets out and discusses these key elements. […] |
||||||
|
All our content may be republished or reused for free, except where otherwise noted. This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||