The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety that was adopted by governments on 29 January 2000 is the main international legally binding treaty that regulates ?the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms resulting from modern biotechnology? that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health?.

It is significant as the first global treaty to attempt to contribute to the protection of biodiversity and human health in this field, and as the first treaty to operationalise the precautionary approach in decision-making relating to imports under the Protocol. As of 22 February 2005, there are 113 Parties to the Protocol.

Although the Protocol focuses on transboundary movements of GMOs, its provisions do influence national and regional biosafety policies and laws, bearing in mind that the Protocol sets minimum requirements and Parties have the right to formulate more comprehensive national laws with higher standards. This is reaffirmed in Article 2(4).

Meanwhile, work and standard setting are also taking place in other international fora, such as the Codex Alimentarius, the International Plant Protection Convention and the International Office of Epizootics, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation and the World Health Organisation.

The linkages among trade, environment and health means that developments at the World Trade Organisation also impact on biosafety and vice versa.

A field of growing importance is the development of biological weapons as part of biodefence programmes where the adequacy of global rules and standards needs examinination.

Treaty on Liability for GMO Damage Closer to Completion

A TWN report on the outcomes of the meeting of the Friends of the Co-Chairs on Liability and Redress in the Context of the Bioafety Protocol in Kuala Lumpur in June 2010. […]

Imminent Threat of Damage from GMOs

A TWN briefing on the concept of imminent threat of damage, an issue under negotiations on Liability and Redress in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. […]

Financial Security:The Example of the Philippine Environmental Guarantee Fund

A TWN briefing on financial security under the Cartagena Protocol on BIosafety: a Philippines Case […]

TWN Comments on Draft Civil Liability Guidelines

TWN’s comments on the draft civil liability guidelines prepared by the ‘Group of Friends of the Co-Chairs on liability and redress in the context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’ (GFCC). […]

Update on Variola (Smallpox) Virus Destruction (May 2010)

This TWN paper updates on ongoing variola virus research projects and the WHO Advisory Committee on Variola Virus Research. It was prepared for the 63rd World Health Assembly (17-21 May 2010). […]

Negotiations on Liability and Redress for LMO Damage Inch Forward: International Treaty in Sight

The Friends of the Co-Chairs Group on Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety held its second meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on 8-12 February 2010. This is a TWN report of the meeting. […]

Some Progress in Meeting on Liability and Redress for GMOs

Parties to the UN Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, in February 2009, have agreed that a legally-binding Supplementary Protocol will be developed on liability and redress for damage from GMOs. […]

Progress after tough talks on liability regime for GMOs

Four years of negotiations on an international liability and redress regime for GMOs under the Biosafety Protocol have failed to conclude as planned. […]

Greenpeace: Overview of the Current Text on Liability and Redress

Paper prepared for the 4th meeting of the Conference of Parties of the Biosafety Protocol, 12-14 May 2008 […]

No Agreement Yet on Liability Regarding GMOs

Negotiations under the UN Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to establish an international regime for liability and redress for damage caused by genetically modified organisms (GMOs) failed to conclude as mandated. […]