The challenge for countries, especially developing countries and countries with economies in transition, is the formulation of national policies and regulatory frameworks to ensure biosafety. The holistic approach to biosafety encompasses scientific, ecological, health, social, economic, cultural and ethical dimensions in the context of the precautionary principle. It also requires a long term perspective in assessing technology and its products.
A comprehensive biosafety policy will need to be accompanied by and integrated with policies in other related fields such as agriculture, science and technology, industrial development, health, biodiversity and environmental protection. An important element would be options for non-gene technology approaches to achieving a stated objective such as increased agricultural productivity, pest and disease management or environmental remediation. For developing countries with limited resources and/or alternative knowledge and practices in farming and health systems, this approach can be both cost-effective and ensures the further strengthening of national capacities and sovereignty over food, nutrition and health. A regulatory framework includes a national law, subsidiary regulations, administrative measures and implementation/enforcement mechanisms. Underlying this is the generation and flow of information and knowledge on biosafety that can be part of the public domain to ensure public participation and ever-deepening understanding and implementation of biosafety.
This section provides some information on the experiences of countries and regions.

US Regulation of GM Crops Severely Criticized

The USDA will produce an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for GE crops resistant to the herbicides 2,4-D or dicamba. Critics maintain that even with the EIS, the USDA’s regulation of GE crops is extremely weak. […]

Lawsuit Filed Against EU Authorisation of Genetically Engineered Soybeans

A coalition of European NGOs are challenging a decision of the EU Commission to authorize a new GM Monsanto soyabean at the European Court of Justice. […]

African Civil Society Calls on the African Union to Ban Genetically Modified Crops

African civil society is calling on the African Union to ban GM crops because of the dire lack of independent, long term safety data. […]

Indian Supreme Court Scientific Panel Recommends Moratorium on GM crops

The Scientific Panel set up by the Indian Supreme Court has unanimously recommended a moratorium on field trials of GM crops in the country, as a result of a public interest petition filed by civil society seeking a ban on GM crops. […]

Asian Communities Press for Biosafety and Corporate Accountability

While new technologies are being rapidly deployed in food and farms all over Asia, the law and policy regimes to ensure that they do not endanger life and biodiversity are still far from fully in place. […]

Database on the Risks Of Genetically Engineered Crop Plants

Published by Testbiotech, this database gives an overview of the authorisation of genetically engineered plants in the European Union. […]

Peru Approves Moratorium on GM Crops

Peruvian President Ollanta Humala and Congress have heared the cries of Peruvian farmers and have banned GMOs for ten years. […]

Under Industry Pressure, USDA Works to Speed Approval of Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered Crops

Collabation between regulators and biotech firms could eliminate a critical level of oversight for the production of GE crops. […]

Peru Moratorium on GMOs get a Boost

Efforts to put in place a moratorium on GMOs in Peru received a boost in Nov 2011 when the Congress overwhelmingly (re)approved a 10-year moratorium that prohibits GMOs from being imported for cultivation or to be raised locally. […]

EU Court Reinforces Zero-tolerance towards Unapproved GMOs

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has issued a groundbreaking judgment which rules that honey contaminated with pollen from GM crops, whether intentionally or adventitiously, needs authorization before being allowed to be marketed. […]