This briefing concludes that deregulating gene-edited organisms will inevitably compromise the ability of governments or trading blocs to protect biosecurity internally and across international borders. […]
|
||||||
|
This proof-of-concept study that shows that genome-edited organisms can be detected in the food chain. […] This report concludes that gene editing remains slow, uncertain and largely unproven in delivering public benefits, despite claims that it would turbo-charge plant breeding. […] The integration of AI into genetic engineering (generative AI) raises concerns that plants with unsafe and undesirable traits may be engineered and released into the environment. […] This study developed analytical methods which allowed reliable detection of mutations introduced in plants made by new genomic techniques. […] – It is not productive or meaningful to genetically modify wild organisms solely based on the assumption of potential benefits and with uncertainty about possible harm. […] This briefing addresses ‘generative’ artificial intelligence (AI) tools, which are now being applied to generate novel digital sequences for GMOs and proteins. […] Using a new method of data evaluation, this study shows that unintentional changes from the use of CRISPR/Cas ‘gene scissors’ are different from random mutations and could present risks. […] Gene drive organisms are characterized by a significant depth of intervention. Therefore, there is a need to broaden the social and political debate over them rather than considering them as an incremental innovation of first-generation GMOs. […] New genomic techniques (NGT) can cause unintended genetic changes, thereby carrying higher risks than earlier assumed. […] |
||||||
|
All our content may be republished or reused for free, except where otherwise noted. This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||