There has been a persistent conflict over agricultural biotechnology, and existing governance institutions relying on traditional processes of scientific risk assessment have failed to address the sociopolitical dimensions of this disagreement. […]
|
||||||
|
Item 1 PRESS RELEASE: GLO […] Item 1 NEW META-ANALYSIS: EXTENSIVE PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GMO AND NON-GMO IN CULTIVATED PLANTS Hygeia Analytics ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO GLYPHOSATE AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IMPACTS IN AGRICULTURAL POPULATION OF ARGENTINA Avila-Vazquez, M., Difilippo, F. S., Mac Lean, B., Maturano, E., & Etchegoyen, A. (2018) J […] EU’S GMO REGULATOR IGNORED HUMAN HEALTH WARNINGS OVER A MONSANTO INSECTICIDAL CORN by Claire Robinson TOXICITY OF FORMULANTS AND HEAVY METALS IN GLYPHOSATE-BASED HERBICIDES AND OTHER PESTICIDES N. Defargea, J. Spiroux de Vendômoisb, G.E. Séralini USE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS AND PESTICIDES IN BRAZIL: GROWING HAZARDS Almeida, V. E. S. D., Friedrich, K., Tygel, A. F., Melgarejo, L., & Carneiro, F. F. In 2013, scientists discovered a new way to precisely edit genes through a technology called CRISPR. Kevin M. Esvelt and colleagues at Harvard University in 2014 suggested that CRISPR could be used to save endangered wildlife from extinction by implanting a fertility-reducing gene in invasive animals, using a so-called gene drive. […] CRITICISM OF EFSA’S SCIENTIFIC OPINION ON COMBINATORIAL EFFECTS OF ‘STACKED’ GM PLANTS |
||||||
|
All our content may be republished or reused for free, except where otherwise noted. This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||