The challenge for countries, especially developing countries and countries with economies in transition, is the formulation of national policies and regulatory frameworks to ensure biosafety. The holistic approach to biosafety encompasses scientific, ecological, health, social, economic, cultural and ethical dimensions in the context of the precautionary principle. It also requires a long term perspective in assessing technology and its products.
A comprehensive biosafety policy will need to be accompanied by and integrated with policies in other related fields such as agriculture, science and technology, industrial development, health, biodiversity and environmental protection. An important element would be options for non-gene technology approaches to achieving a stated objective such as increased agricultural productivity, pest and disease management or environmental remediation. For developing countries with limited resources and/or alternative knowledge and practices in farming and health systems, this approach can be both cost-effective and ensures the further strengthening of national capacities and sovereignty over food, nutrition and health. A regulatory framework includes a national law, subsidiary regulations, administrative measures and implementation/enforcement mechanisms. Underlying this is the generation and flow of information and knowledge on biosafety that can be part of the public domain to ensure public participation and ever-deepening understanding and implementation of biosafety.
This section provides some information on the experiences of countries and regions.

No genetically contaminated seeds: Austrian Regulation leads EU way

This is an account of how Austria’s “zero-tolerance” policy of seed purity came about and how its success could make it an example to be followed by the rest of Europe. […]

Trilateral Agreement a Pre-emptive Strike by Exporting Countries

Lim Li Lin and Lim Li Ching assess the Trilateral Agreement between the US, Canada and Mexico on documentation requirements for living modified organisms for food, feed or processing. […]

Trilateral Agreement a Pre-emptive Strike by Exporting Countries

Lim Li Lin and Lim Li Ching assess the Trilateral Agreement between the US, Canada and Mexico on documentation requirements for living modified organisms for food, feed or processing. […]

Trilateral Agreement a Pre-emptive Strike by Exporting Countries (Chinese)

Lim Li Lin and Lim Li Ching assess the Trilateral Agreement between the US, Canada and Mexico on documentation requirements for living modified organisms for food, feed or processing. […]

Trilateral Agreement a Pre-emptive Strike by Exporting Countries (Chinese)

Lim Li Lin and Lim Li Ching assess the Trilateral Agreement between the US, Canada and Mexico on documentation requirements for living modified organisms for food, feed or processing. […]

GM Crop Moratorium Bill 2004

The Australian Government’s Gene Technology (GM Crop Moratorium) Bill imposes a moratorium on the environmental release of GM crops in the Australian Capital Territory until mid-2006, but has provisions to allow scientific research to continue. […]

Regulatory Sham on Bt-Crops

Prof. Joe Cummins exposes the regulatory sham involved in GM crops containing a range of biopesticides […]

AU Expert Group Calls for Moratorium on GMOs

A group of African experts convened under the auspices of the African Union took a first and critically important step towards laying the groundwork for common African policies on issues concerning GE. […]

Canada Rejects Patents on Higher Life Forms

Canada’s Supreme Court rules out patents on higher life forms. Lim Li Ching reports on this landmark decision and its wider implications. […]